The Official Website - Aug 30, 2008 - 05:22 PM


 

 


 




 


 Log in Problems?
 New User? Sign Up!
 


Nerine Shatner Friendly House

This non profit organization is one of the nation's first residential homes for women recovering from alcohol and substance abuse.

Donate Here>>>

 
Hollywood
Charity
Horse Show


For the past eleven years, William Shatner has spearheaded the HCHS which features some of the best western reining riders in the country while simultaneously raising money for charity.

Donate Here>>>

 
  William
Shatner also
Supports:


March of
Dimes Canada

The Jewish
National Fund



 
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
erifahOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 06:22 PM
This account has been Permanently Banned


Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 2110
Location: The Great State of Arizona
Status: Offline
*diane* wrote:
erifah wrote:
*diane* wrote:


I notice both of you are ignoring June's always excellent contribution to this type of discussion.

Diane


I read it; what she wrote was not inconsistent with what I posted.


*pause*

Interesting.

Diane


It will take some work on your part to think through the subtle nuances of my thinking, but I'm sure you are up to it...
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Dave
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 06:29 PM
Member


Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 19345
Location: Somewhere right of center.
*diane* wrote:
Dave wrote:

This was near the end of Bush 41's administration and the beginning of Clinton's. Someone dropped the ball, and it wasn't a Republican. (As usual) IMHO.

~Dave




Dave,

That makes absolutely no sense (as usual). IMHO.

Diane


And as usual you fail to comment on "why" it makes no sense.

~Dave
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
*diane*
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 06:33 PM
Guest





Dave wrote:
*diane* wrote:
Dave wrote:

This was near the end of Bush 41's administration and the beginning of Clinton's. Someone dropped the ball, and it wasn't a Republican. (As usual) IMHO.

~Dave




Dave,

That makes absolutely no sense (as usual). IMHO.

Diane


And as usual you fail to comment on "why" it makes no sense.

~Dave


You appear to be blaming on the Clinton administration events that took place during the Bush/Reagan administrations. That makes no sense.

Diane
 
   
Reply with quote Back to top
Dave
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 06:35 PM
Member


Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 19345
Location: Somewhere right of center.
*diane* wrote:
Dave wrote:
*diane* wrote:
Dave wrote:

This was near the end of Bush 41's administration and the beginning of Clinton's. Someone dropped the ball, and it wasn't a Republican. (As usual) IMHO.

~Dave




Dave,

That makes absolutely no sense (as usual). IMHO.

Diane


And as usual you fail to comment on "why" it makes no sense.

~Dave


You appear to be blaming on the Clinton administration events that took place during the Bush/Reagan administrations. That makes no sense.

Diane


Why not? The Dems blame the economy fall which started under Clinton, on the Bush administration.

~Dave
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
*diane*
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 06:38 PM
Guest





erifah wrote:

It will take some work on your part to think through the subtle nuances of my thinking, but I'm sure you are up to it...


Erifah,

"Subtle" is usually not the word I associate with you.

Nah, this is just a case where your slip is showing, which is something you are usually careful not to do.

And I'm sure you are equally up to understanding what I am saying as well.

*arched eyebrow*

Diane
 
   
Reply with quote Back to top
*diane*
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 06:40 PM
Guest





Dave wrote:
*diane* wrote:
Dave wrote:
*diane* wrote:
Dave wrote:

This was near the end of Bush 41's administration and the beginning of Clinton's. Someone dropped the ball, and it wasn't a Republican. (As usual) IMHO.

~Dave




Dave,

That makes absolutely no sense (as usual). IMHO.

Diane


And as usual you fail to comment on "why" it makes no sense.

~Dave


You appear to be blaming on the Clinton administration events that took place during the Bush/Reagan administrations. That makes no sense.

Diane


Why not? The Dems blame the economy fall which started under Clinton, on the Bush administration.

~Dave


Why not? Because it's stupid.

I blame the economy fall on lots of things, but the Bush administration is not one of them.

Diane
 
   
Reply with quote Back to top
Dave
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 06:45 PM
Member


Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 19345
Location: Somewhere right of center.
*diane* wrote:
Dave wrote:
*diane* wrote:
Dave wrote:
*diane* wrote:
Dave wrote:

This was near the end of Bush 41's administration and the beginning of Clinton's. Someone dropped the ball, and it wasn't a Republican. (As usual) IMHO.

~Dave




Dave,

That makes absolutely no sense (as usual). IMHO.

Diane


And as usual you fail to comment on "why" it makes no sense.

~Dave


You appear to be blaming on the Clinton administration events that took place during the Bush/Reagan administrations. That makes no sense.

Diane


Why not? The Dems blame the economy fall which started under Clinton, on the Bush administration.

~Dave


Why not? Because it's stupid.

I blame the economy fall on lots of things, but the Bush administration is not one of them.

Diane


Just because something "begins" under one administration, doesn't mean that the next administration doesn't have a responsibility to follow through on these "in-place policies" with some kind of oversight. The ball is being dropped from one administration to the next. There is sometimes no continuity of purpose. And it is bipartisan. It applies to both parties. IMHO.

~Dave
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
erifahOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 06:48 PM
This account has been Permanently Banned


Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 2110
Location: The Great State of Arizona
Status: Offline
*diane* wrote:
erifah wrote:

It will take some work on your part to think through the subtle nuances of my thinking, but I'm sure you are up to it...


Erifah,

"Subtle" is usually not the word I associate with you.

Nah, this is just a case where your slip is showing, which is something you are usually careful not to do.

And I'm sure you are equally up to understanding what I am saying as well.

*arched eyebrow*

Diane


I mean what I say and say what I mean. I see no inconsistency between what June and I have posted. Her conclusions are different than mine, of course.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
rag451Offline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 06:53 PM
Member


Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 352
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
*diane* wrote:
erifah wrote:

It will take some work on your part to think through the subtle nuances of my thinking, but I'm sure you are up to it...


Erifah,

"Subtle" is usually not the word I associate with you.

Nah, this is just a case where your slip is showing, which is something you are usually careful not to do.

And I'm sure you are equally up to understanding what I am saying as well.

*arched eyebrow*

Diane


Erifah's slip is showing? Maybe there are a few things about the old boy that we don't know...? Wink

Robert

_________________
"Maybe we weren't meant for Paradise. Maybe we were meant to fight our way through, struggle, claw our way up, scratch for every inch of the way. Maybe we can't stroll to the music of the lute, we must march to the sound of drums."

-- Kirk to McCoy
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
erifahOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 06:54 PM
This account has been Permanently Banned


Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 2110
Location: The Great State of Arizona
Status: Offline
*diane* wrote:


Nah, this is just a case where your slip is showing, which is something you are usually careful not to do.

And I'm sure you are equally up to understanding what I am saying as well.

*arched eyebrow*

Diane


BTW, are you trying to say you want to look up my slip? You are such a dirty girl! And I'm feeling like such a bad boy!
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
*diane*
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 06:55 PM
Guest





erifah wrote:

I mean what I say and say what I mean. I see no inconsistency between what June and I have posted. Her conclusions are different than mine, of course.


Yes, that is exactly what I find interesting.

By the way, I haven't seen this posted yet, but I may have missed it. The UN resolution is downloadable as a pdf from this site.

Diane
 
   
Reply with quote Back to top
*diane*
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 07:01 PM
Guest





erifah wrote:

BTW, are you trying to say you want to look up my slip? You are such a dirty girl! And I'm feeling like such a bad boy!


Image *sigh* I suppose you want to be spanked....

Brings to mind this image, much too large to post.

Diane
 
   
Reply with quote Back to top
Dave
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 07:03 PM
Member


Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 19345
Location: Somewhere right of center.
*diane* wrote:
erifah wrote:

BTW, are you trying to say you want to look up my slip? You are such a dirty girl! And I'm feeling like such a bad boy!


Image *sigh* I suppose you want to be spanked....

Brings to mind this image, much too large to post.

Diane


OH MY!!

~Dave Laughing
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
erifahOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 07:07 PM
This account has been Permanently Banned


Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 2110
Location: The Great State of Arizona
Status: Offline
*diane* wrote:
erifah wrote:

I mean what I say and say what I mean. I see no inconsistency between what June and I have posted. Her conclusions are different than mine, of course.


Yes, that is exactly what I find interesting.

By the way, I haven't seen this posted yet, but I may have missed it. The UN resolution is downloadable as a pdf from this site.

Diane


So what is YOUR view, Diane?

1.) The U.S. did not provide anthrax to Iraq with a malicious intent.

2.) The U.S. did so, as June says, with "blinders" firmly in place.

Or,

3.) The U.S. did help the Iraqi biological-weapons or chemical-weapons program on a knowledgeable basis.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
erifahOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Nov 09, 2002 - 07:08 PM
This account has been Permanently Banned


Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 2110
Location: The Great State of Arizona
Status: Offline
*diane* wrote:
erifah wrote:

BTW, are you trying to say you want to look up my slip? You are such a dirty girl! And I'm feeling like such a bad boy!


Image *sigh* I suppose you want to be spanked....

Brings to mind this image, much too large to post.

Diane


*erifah clicks on the link, and proceeds to laugh his arse off...*
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Powered by PNphpBB2 © 2003-2006 The PNphpBB Group
Credits
Bill's Space Lisabeth's Space Fan Club Forum News and Events Store Links
©2006 Picture Partners & Melis Productions

Contact WilliamShatner.com | Privacy Policy