| Author |
Message |
|
|
 |
Post subject: New Star Trek XI Trailer....spoilers
 Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 12:50 AM
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Posts: 16181
Location: Jaw Jah
|
|
From Cool News 
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/39031
Sounds exciting.
I remember paying no attention to these before until
I read one concerning the opening scene of "Insurrection"
...and it was right on 
 |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Grizzlor |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 03:55 AM
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 07, 2002
Posts: 383
Location: Northern NJ
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 04:03 AM
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Posts: 16181
Location: Jaw Jah
|
|
Did you read it?
I assume they saw exactly what they said they saw 
Or, is this one of those BBK things and you will refuse to like
this movie no matter how it turns out? |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzlor |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 05:26 AM
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 07, 2002
Posts: 383
Location: Northern NJ
Status: Offline
|
|
| No I just don't like the look of the ship. Also, I don't want to read plot spoilers. |
_________________
"What's the matter Jim?" "I miss my old chair"
www.paunchstevenson.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
morgram |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 03:49 PM
|
|
This account has been Permanently Banned
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 6049
Status: Offline
|
|
| Yeah! I can SEE the ST-TMP and TNG influence!.....and THAT THING is suppose to bring 1st generation trekkers back into the fold??????? Does paramount honestly believe that THAT monstrosity or is it abomination....is going to recapture the hearts of old line trek fandom? Next year when this latest debacle opens long misguided paramount is going to wish that they had kept that THING in drydock. If Bil is really down in the dumps about being locked out of star trek then my guess it would cheer him up almost immediately to see a picture of that thing. He might even break out laughing although I`m not laughing. I`m just truly dumbfounded at the mentality of the fools running paramount who shortly will be burying star trek forever. |
Last edited by morgram on Nov 12, 2008 - 03:59 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 03:58 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 07, 2002
Posts: 8631
|
|
| morgram wrote: | | Yeah! I can SEE the ST-TMP and TNG influence!.....and THAT THING is suppose to bring 1st generation trekkers back into the fold??????? Does paramount honestly believe that THAT monstrosity or is it abomination....is going to recapture the hearts of old line trek fandom? Next year when this latest debacle opens long misguided paramount is going to wish that they had kept that THING in drydock. |
Here we go again... The ever-so "optimistic" mental meanderings of Morgram. As usual, you will be wrong. Star Trek seems set to be the movie event of next year. Abrams is a savvy player, and even if the film turns out to be crap, like... say... Transformers, it is certain to do well. Having said that, I have heard nothing but positive comments from everyone who has had a glimpse at the film.
With new Trek and a new, wonderful, glorious President... Man, life is good!  |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
morgram |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 04:00 PM
|
|
This account has been Permanently Banned
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 6049
Status: Offline
|
|
| Harry_Mudd wrote: | | morgram wrote: | | Yeah! I can SEE the ST-TMP and TNG influence!.....and THAT THING is suppose to bring 1st generation trekkers back into the fold??????? Does paramount honestly believe that THAT monstrosity or is it abomination....is going to recapture the hearts of old line trek fandom? Next year when this latest debacle opens long misguided paramount is going to wish that they had kept that THING in drydock. |
Here we go again... The ever-so "optimistic" mental meanderings of Morgram. As usual, you will be wrong. Star Trek seems set to be the movie even of next year. Abrams is a savvy player, and even if the film turns out to be crap, like... say... Transformers, it is certain to do well. Having said that, I have heard nothing but positive comments from everyone who has had a glimpse at the film.
With new Trek and a new, wonderful, glorious President... Man, life is good! |
Harry, you`re wrong about this! |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
morgram |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 04:01 PM
|
|
This account has been Permanently Banned
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 6049
Status: Offline
|
|
| morgram wrote: | | Grizzlor wrote: | Exciting? Did they see the "Enterprise?"
|
Yeah! I can SEE the ST-TMP and TNG influence!.....and THAT THING is suppose to bring 1st generation trekkers back into the fold??????? Does paramount honestly believe that THAT monstrosity or is it abomination....is going to recapture the hearts of old line trek fandom? Next year when this latest debacle opens long misguided paramount is going to wish that they had kept that THING in drydock. If Bill is really down in the dumps about being locked out of star trek then my guess it would cheer him up almost immediately to see a picture of that thing. He might even break out laughing although I`m not laughing. I`m just truly dumbfounded at the mentality of the fools running paramount who shortly will be burying star trek forever. |
|
Last edited by morgram on Nov 12, 2008 - 04:04 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 04:02 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 07, 2002
Posts: 8631
|
|
| morgram wrote: | | Harry, you`re wrong about this! |
Here's a bet. If the movie is a flop, I will never post here again. If the movie is a major hit, you will promise to do the same. |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
morgram |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 04:04 PM
|
|
This account has been Permanently Banned
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 6049
Status: Offline
|
|
| Harry_Mudd wrote: | | morgram wrote: | | Harry, you`re wrong about this! |
Here's a bet. If the movie is a flop, I will never post here again. If the movie is a major hit, you will promise to do the same. |
You`re on! |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 04:05 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 9293
Location: "It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem."~ G.K.C
|
|
| Harry_Mudd wrote: | | morgram wrote: | | Harry, you`re wrong about this! |
Here's a bet. If the movie is a flop, I will never post here again. If the movie is a major hit, you will promise to do the same. |
 Good Call Mate!
~Doc |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 04:07 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 07, 2002
Posts: 8631
|
|
| DOC wrote: | | Harry_Mudd wrote: | | morgram wrote: | | Harry, you`re wrong about this! |
Here's a bet. If the movie is a flop, I will never post here again. If the movie is a major hit, you will promise to do the same. |
Good Call Mate!
~Doc |
You remember this, mate! |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 04:08 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 07, 2002
Posts: 8631
|
|
| morgram wrote: | | Harry_Mudd wrote: | | morgram wrote: | | Harry, you`re wrong about this! |
Here's a bet. If the movie is a flop, I will never post here again. If the movie is a major hit, you will promise to do the same. |
You`re on! |
A bet is a bet! I stand by my promise and I expect you to do the same.
Having said that, you may as well stop posting now. |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 04:10 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 9293
Location: "It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem."~ G.K.C
|
|
| Harry_Mudd wrote: | | DOC wrote: | | Harry_Mudd wrote: | | morgram wrote: | | Harry, you`re wrong about this! |
Here's a bet. If the movie is a flop, I will never post here again. If the movie is a major hit, you will promise to do the same. |
Good Call Mate!
~Doc |
You remember this, mate! |
It's embedded!
~Doc |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 05:20 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Posts: 14477
|
|
| We've got to put up with this until next May? Oy vey. |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 05:34 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 08, 2002
Posts: 17903
Location: Upstate New York
|
|
Having Read the Articles... I have to admit that I am excited....
...and how many People have played Dr. Who or James Bond?
D
 |
_________________
Rest Easy...The Icon Above is an: ALBINO VULCAN....Yellow...Red Eyed...Bald...Pointed Ears...and....[Dramatic Pause]...Smiling!!!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 05:46 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 9293
Location: "It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem."~ G.K.C
|
|
| Mirizor wrote: | | We've got to put up with this until next May? Oy vey. |
Let's ask Paul to make this thread a "Sticky" |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 07:15 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 08, 2002
Posts: 17903
Location: Upstate New York
|
|
| DOC wrote: | | Mirizor wrote: | | We've got to put up with this until next May? Oy vey. |
Let's ask Paul to make this thread a "Sticky" |
I think Ya' just did!
D
|
_________________
Rest Easy...The Icon Above is an: ALBINO VULCAN....Yellow...Red Eyed...Bald...Pointed Ears...and....[Dramatic Pause]...Smiling!!!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Piglet |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 08:09 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Apr 14, 2007
Posts: 240
Location: Colchester, England
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 08:12 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 18, 2005
Posts: 4619
Location: Ottawa, Canada
|
|
Let's light this candle.  N |
_________________
"Not bad .... for a human"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
morgram |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 08:29 PM
|
|
This account has been Permanently Banned
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 6049
Status: Offline
|
|
| Piglet wrote: |
It's the wrong shape!!! |
So THIS is the new Paramount/J.J. Abrams recipe for success. A mingling of some of the visual elements of tos with tng. Some recipe. My initial impression was that this newest film was to be a tos throwback pure an simple instead we`re going to get this nonsensical conglomeration? Tos and tng are fundamentally incompatible with each other. Tos was a product of the 1960s, mores and all, while tng reflects late 80s/90s and 2000s left-wing political correctness. This impending mess might work with some very young movie-goers if paramount is real lucky. What a mess that thing is. Methinks I hath madeth an easy wager. Apparently from the looks of that thing Abrams is going to try and bypass TOS altogether and just link some elements of ST-TMP with TNG. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
morgram |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 08:40 PM
|
|
This account has been Permanently Banned
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 6049
Status: Offline
|
|
| morgram wrote: | | Piglet wrote: |
It's the wrong shape!!! |
So THIS is the new Paramount/J.J. Abrams recipe for success. A mingling of some of the visual elements of tos with tng. Some recipe. My initial impression was that this newest film was to be a tos throwback pure an simple instead we`re going to get this nonsensical conglomeration? Tos and tng are fundamentally incompatible with each other. Tos was a product of the 1960s, mores and all, while tng reflects late 80s/90s and 2000s left-wing political correctness. This impending mess might work with some very young movie-goers if paramount is real lucky. What a mess that thing is. Methinks I hath madeth an easy wager. Apparently from the looks of that thing Abrams is going to try and bypass TOS altogether and just link some elements of ST-TMP with TNG. |
I wonder what the late Joan Winston and Bjo Trimble would say if they saw that thing. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 08:46 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Posts: 14477
|
|
| morgram wrote: | | morgram wrote: | | Piglet wrote: |
It's the wrong shape!!! |
So THIS is the new Paramount/J.J. Abrams recipe for success. A mingling of some of the visual elements of tos with tng. Some recipe. My initial impression was that this newest film was to be a tos throwback pure an simple instead we`re going to get this nonsensical conglomeration? Tos and tng are fundamentally incompatible with each other. Tos was a product of the 1960s, mores and all, while tng reflects late 80s/90s and 2000s left-wing political correctness. This impending mess might work with some very young movie-goers if paramount is real lucky. What a mess that thing is. Methinks I hath madeth an easy wager. Apparently from the looks of that thing Abrams is going to try and bypass TOS altogether and just link some elements of ST-TMP with TNG. |
I wonder what the late Joan Winston and Bjo Trimble would say if they saw that thing. |
They may say...
it's only a movie...
it's only a movie...
it's only a movie... |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Paul |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 09:55 PM
|
|
Site Admin
Joined: Sep 23, 2002
Posts: 4900
Location: The Cyber Frontier
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 10:22 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Posts: 14477
|
|
| Paul wrote: | No Sticky!
Also, can we pre-define "flop" and "hit"?
-Paul |
Millions (or billions) of dollars perhaps?
Morgram is so sure the film will be a 'flop'.
Harry_Mudd is damn sure the film will be a 'hit'.
Are both of them sure they're willing to leave the forum because of this bet? |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
