The Official Website - May 23, 2012 - 03:28 PM


 

 


 




 


 Log in Problems?
 New User? Sign Up!
 


Nerine Shatner Friendly House

This non profit organization is one of the nation's first residential homes for women recovering from alcohol and substance abuse.

Donate Here>>>

 
Hollywood
Charity
Horse Show


For the past several years, William Shatner has spearheaded the HCHS which features some of the best western reining riders in the country while simultaneously raising money for charity.

Donate Here>>>

 
  William
Shatner also
Supports:


March of
Dimes Canada

The Jewish
National Fund



 
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Mirizor
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 21, 2008 - 05:33 PM
Member


Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Posts: 14477

Johnny_Turbo wrote:
Harry_Mudd wrote:


Right, back to fighting the scourge that is TV Land!


YES! Back to the priorities! Oh, and now TV Land has the audacity to broadcast 3rd Rock From The Sun! Why, I oughta....

Pre-1920's RULE, man!! We need to move ahead by looking back!!


Image

Whaddya mean TV Land has the audacity to broadcast 3rd Rock From The Sun? Why wasn't I notified of these things?
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
Johnny_TurboOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 21, 2008 - 05:46 PM
Member


Joined: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 8366
Location: Chillville, PA
Status: Offline
Hee! Hee! I love New Jersey!

TV Land, in all it's self-righteous, sanctimonious zeal, has decided NOT to broadcast the episodes with Shatner. Just like showing The Beverly Hillbillies but only the B/W episodes!

TV Land is such a tease!

_________________
Image
"The problem with price quotes on the internet is you cannot confirm their validity."--Abraham Lincoln
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
PigletOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 21, 2008 - 07:37 PM
Member


Joined: Apr 14, 2007
Posts: 240
Location: Colchester, England
Status: Offline
Johnny_Turbo wrote:
Piglet wrote:

Did anyone find a sense of humour any where???
Not yet, but there's still hope! Well, not for me, but...

I'm sure Star Trek IX will be a very good film and probably break lots of records. Hopefully not my Muddy Waters, "My Dog Can't Bark" record. It looks like the best film due to come out in the next 12 minutes. That's the U.S. for ya! Short attention span, A.D.D., O.D.D. (Obsessive Defiant Disorder, The Tanner)

And although I don't plan to go see it..I probably will you know what curiousity does.. Me too! I won't see it, yet I will see it. I can do this by peeping at it during regular intervals through my 3rd eye.

Anyway lightenup. Is this a racist statement??

Bills right when he says 'It's just a TV Show!'

It's just a Film...so....Get a Life will ya! Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink
And here I've been trying unsuccessfully, for years, to get a death!

Please do not get upset with me Sorry, too late! Why I'm upset? I haven't a clue, as with all other things in life!
People behind the scenes as well as infront of the camera will be working awfully hard to make sure everyone will enjoy the Film for the two or so hours that it's watched. They will want us the views to 'Enjoy the ride' so why don't we do just that.

It'll be a hoot,
Woodsy Owl??

Don't get so stressed.
Impossible! Too much coffee. Wait a minute! I don't drink coffee.


Laughing Laughing Thanks for cheering me up.

Which(The photo below of Bill as Giant Head) reminds me 3rd Rock from the Sun - is it available on DVD? I haven't seen it yet!! Least ways not the episode Bill appears in.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Johnny_TurboOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 21, 2008 - 09:10 PM
Member


Joined: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 8366
Location: Chillville, PA
Status: Offline
If I wasn't so against it, I'd suggest watching 3rd Rock on TV Land, but that's like asking someone to live in a post-1920's world! Torture!!

Probably someone on fleabay has the G. Big Head episodes.

_________________
Image
"The problem with price quotes on the internet is you cannot confirm their validity."--Abraham Lincoln
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
britstarfan
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 21, 2008 - 11:07 PM
This account has been Permanently Banned


Joined: Mar 25, 2003
Posts: 7713
Location: 221B Baker Street London
Image




Buck Murdock: We'd better get to the tower, Lieutenant.
Lt. Pervis: We have no tower, sir.
Buck Murdock: No tower?
Lt. Pervis: Just a bridge, sir.
Buck Murdock: Why the hell aren't I notified about these things?
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Debb
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 - 12:37 AM
Member


Joined: Feb 04, 2003
Posts: 8930
Location: Planet Earth
Remakes are always risky and most often do not rise to the level of the original.

But being open minded about the possibilities that a new set of actors bringing to today's audience a new and fresh approach to the series, well, Trek in the 60's influenced my life, whose to say that this cast will not do the same for today's youth.

I will surely spend CAD $5 to see a matinee and then I'll render an opinion that is based on fact and not supposition.

_________________
"OVER 9000"
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
ASBOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 - 12:46 AM
Member


Joined: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 1754
Location: Country NSW
Status: Offline
Dam they will be modernising the Battlestar Galactica next, oh thats right, they already did that and the world didn't end.

_________________
When Hell Freezes Over I'll Ski There Too
E=M'Ski Squared.

Ausi Ski Bum (ASB)
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Harry_Mudd
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 - 08:06 AM
Member


Joined: Nov 07, 2002
Posts: 8631

Johnny_Turbo wrote:
If I wasn't so against it, I'd suggest watching 3rd Rock on TV Land, but that's like asking someone to live in a post-1920's world! Torture!!


I couldn't agree more with you!

_________________
Image
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
CaptainRobertAprilOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 - 09:11 AM
Member


Joined: Nov 04, 2002
Posts: 22
Location: Denver, Colorado
Status: Offline
ASB wrote:
I was born in 1961 and as a little kid in the UK, Singapore and Australia I used to watch this kids show Star Trek, it was on in the afternoon after School (about 5pm). Later it became one of those shows repeated over and over with Gilligans Island. When did it get so complicated.

It wasn't until TNG that Star Trek actually moved from a kids show to a peak viewing period show, I am not sure when it was on in America but it was definatly a kids show where I grew up. One thing I am pretty sure about was I never remember worrying about the History, I was just amazed at how the doors opened themselves.


It was never a kid's show in America, despite what the critics said in the beginning. It ran in prime time on NBC. In fact, the whole point of the show was that it was a serious, adult, science fiction show.

Gods, I'm three years younger than you and I suddenly feel so old....

_________________
ROBERT D. APRIL, Captain, SFC
Commander, USS ELDRIDGE NCC-1787
Captain April's Briefing Room
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
CaptainRobertAprilOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 - 09:15 AM
Member


Joined: Nov 04, 2002
Posts: 22
Location: Denver, Colorado
Status: Offline
ASB wrote:
Dam they will be modernising the Battlestar Galactica next, oh thats right, they already did that and the world didn't end.


Galactica only had one mediocre season and one horrid spinoff to jettison, not forty years of built up continuity, including five spinoff series, ten movies, and enough books and magazines to choke a Barnes & Noble into submission.

Big fat hairy difference.

_________________
ROBERT D. APRIL, Captain, SFC
Commander, USS ELDRIDGE NCC-1787
Captain April's Briefing Room
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
morgramOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 - 01:09 PM
This account has been Permanently Banned


Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 6049

Status: Offline
CaptainRobertApril wrote:
ASB wrote:
Dam they will be modernising the Battlestar Galactica next, oh thats right, they already did that and the world didn't end.


Galactica only had one mediocre season and one horrid spinoff to jettison, not forty years of built up continuity, including five spinoff series, ten movies, and enough books and magazines to choke a Barnes & Noble into submission.

Big fat hairy difference.
Yes, it is indeed strange how some who profess to being tos fans have absolutely no problem with altering 40 years of established continuity yet we are to understand that they are tos fans.........yeah, sure they are.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
ASBOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 - 02:30 PM
Member


Joined: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 1754
Location: Country NSW
Status: Offline
Laughing Laughing Laughing what does it matter, why get so uptight, this is what I never will understand, if watching the show you say your such a fan of causes you so much distress, don't watch it.

Its meant to be entertainment, discuss it, enjoy it but don't stress over it, its not real honnest.

_________________
When Hell Freezes Over I'll Ski There Too
E=M'Ski Squared.

Ausi Ski Bum (ASB)
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Johnny_TurboOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 - 03:35 PM
Member


Joined: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 8366
Location: Chillville, PA
Status: Offline
ASB wrote:
Laughing Laughing Laughing what does it matter, why get so uptight, this is what I never will understand, if watching the show you say your such a fan of causes you so much distress, don't watch it.

Its meant to be entertainment, discuss it, enjoy it but don't stress over it, its not real honnest.


It's funny, when Playstation was the new game console, I enjoyed playing some games but at the same time, I'd get stressed, uptight and frustrated if I wrecked or died right before I was to complete a level.

I'm willing to give this movie a chance, like I did with many other sequels. I was very pleasantly surprised with the new James Bond movie, especially the scenes in Uganda.

However, there's something to be said with the 60's Trek. The actors, the writers. They had some really, really good stories. The stories were so good, it's like I forgot I was watching an outer space show. And with a Desilu budget, those people did a fantastic job!! Remember Mindmeld? " Is it in his contract? No, no. No phone!!"

_________________
Image
"The problem with price quotes on the internet is you cannot confirm their validity."--Abraham Lincoln
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
morgramOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 - 06:40 PM
This account has been Permanently Banned


Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 6049

Status: Offline
ASB wrote:
Laughing Laughing Laughing what does it matter, why get so uptight, this is what I never will understand, if watching the show you say your such a fan of causes you so much distress, don't watch it.

Its meant to be entertainment, discuss it, enjoy it but don't stress over it, its not real honnest.
You`re not addressing the issue which is why should lifelong star trek fans go along with altering the very foundations of what was layed down on television 40+ years ago? Why is it okay to screw around with 40 years of established canon? You say because none of it is real. Well, that certainly addresses the issue.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
morgramOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 22, 2008 - 06:58 PM
This account has been Permanently Banned


Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 6049

Status: Offline
Case in point. The 2nd pilot "Where No Man Has Gone Before". At the end of the episode a mutated Gary Mitchell prepares a grave for our hero James R. Kirk as it reads on the gravestone. So there`s an early example of something that was changed. Now lets take it a little further. It has been implied that the "blonde lab technician" mentioned to Kirk by Gary Mitchell in sickbay was Carol Marcus. I personally doubt that was ever in the minds of the geniuses behind Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. It`s just a pleasant coincidental line of dialogue that has been used to reconcile Carol Marcus to tos. Now suppose...just suppose that David Marcus WAS NOT kirk`s son. He was Gary Mitchell`s boy! LOL! See how silly this screwing around with trek canon can get. With the dissimilar tos bridge set in star trek 11 Abrams is DESTROYING the visual continuity with tos. I don`t hold with it.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
ASBOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 25, 2008 - 11:17 AM
Member


Joined: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 1754
Location: Country NSW
Status: Offline
Ah now here we cross the divide from fan to full blown fanatic, when TOS was written no one really considered the history line and precise connections, it was a low budget sci fi show made in the studio next to where they made Mission Impossible. The history ws more a TNG creation due to the growth in the fan base and people like yourself wanting to know more and more, it was actually a lot more to do with merchandising, the release of huge volumes of information on the ship, the crew and more that was never really discussed on the screen

So in Trek 11 I was quite happy to accept that it was Kirks son, I am quite happy to accept that Kirk died in Generations but he still exists in the nexus after all Guinan existed both on the Enterprises and in the Nexus. I am also happy to accept when main characters get killed off in a series after all it can't always be the red shirts that die.

Oh a side note, why is it that Whoopi Goldberg was uncredited in the movie when she was a very important part of the story.

Does this make me less of a fan, no I am just a fan of Star Trek and Star Trek is far more than any one actor or character. Lets hope that the new movie is hugely successful and it generates interest in a new TV show like the movies in the 70;s did.

_________________
When Hell Freezes Over I'll Ski There Too
E=M'Ski Squared.

Ausi Ski Bum (ASB)
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
morgramOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 26, 2008 - 10:03 PM
This account has been Permanently Banned


Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 6049

Status: Offline
ASB wrote:
Ah now here we cross the divide from fan to full blown fanatic, when TOS was written no one really considered the history line and precise connections, it was a low budget sci fi show made in the studio next to where they made Mission Impossible. The history ws more a TNG creation due to the growth in the fan base and people like yourself wanting to know more and more, it was actually a lot more to do with merchandising, the release of huge volumes of information on the ship, the crew and more that was never really discussed on the screen

So in Trek 11 I was quite happy to accept that it was Kirks son, I am quite happy to accept that Kirk died in Generations but he still exists in the nexus after all Guinan existed both on the Enterprises and in the Nexus. I am also happy to accept when main characters get killed off in a series after all it can't always be the red shirts that die.

Oh a side note, why is it that Whoopi Goldberg was uncredited in the movie when she was a very important part of the story.

Does this make me less of a fan, no I am just a fan of Star Trek and Star Trek is far more than any one actor or character. Lets hope that the new movie is hugely successful and it generates interest in a new TV show like the movies in the 70;s did.
Yeah, but ASB, your thinking stems from a bias and that is that all things TNG should override all things tos. Why? Why should that be? Because paramount has opted for TNG over tos canon? That is Abrams`, Berman`s, Braga`s and paramount`s problen, not the whole of worldwide trek fandom`s.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Powered by PNphpBB2 © 2003-2006 The PNphpBB Group
Credits
Bill's Space Lisabeth's Space Fan Club Forum News and Events Store Links
©2006 Picture Partners & Melis Productions

Contact WilliamShatner.com | Privacy Policy