| Author |
Message |
|
|
Post subject: FIRST PICTURES FROM STAR TREK!!! IT LOOKS GREAT!
 Posted: Oct 16, 2008 - 07:03 AM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 07, 2002
Posts: 8631
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 16, 2008 - 12:07 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 07, 2002
Posts: 8631
|
|
| No comments yet!!!??? Damn, I am SOOO excited by these images. |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 16, 2008 - 01:15 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 13, 2002
Posts: 21145
Location: The Netherlands
|
|
I'm not sure what to think of them 
Yes....they got the part of McCoy to the right actor and most of the others are more or less look a like's , but I feel it's to soon for me to makeup my mind wether I like it or not  |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Johnny_Turbo |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 16, 2008 - 02:32 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 8366
Location: Chillville, PA
Status: Offline
|
|
The 1st thing I saw was Michael Strahan, former NY Giants DE!! I scrolled down too quickly.
The bridge looks really cool.
The one pic with Kirk and the shuttlecraft in ice was chilly also!
I wonder if Spock is going to neck pinch anyone in this movie.
Harry, thanks for the funny comment on youtube! Really enjoyed the Eisenstein comparison!! Hee! Hee! |
_________________
"The problem with price quotes on the internet is you cannot confirm their validity."--Abraham Lincoln
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 16, 2008 - 02:34 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: May 28, 2003
Posts: 3218
Location: ohhhh here and there
|
|
Syler!!! aaaaack! Run away!... just kidding.
I don't know what to think either.. but it was fun looking at the photos. |
_________________
~When Words Are Not Enough~
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 16, 2008 - 02:51 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 07, 2002
Posts: 8631
|
|
| Johnny_Turbo wrote: |
Harry, thanks for the funny comment on youtube! Really enjoyed the Eisenstein comparison!! Hee! Hee! |
How did you know it was me? I loved, loved, loved your video... very funny! Make more, seriously! |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny_Turbo |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 16, 2008 - 02:56 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 8366
Location: Chillville, PA
Status: Offline
|
|
| Harry_Mudd wrote: | | Johnny_Turbo wrote: |
Harry, thanks for the funny comment on youtube! Really enjoyed the Eisenstein comparison!! Hee! Hee! |
How did you know it was me? I loved, loved, loved your video... very funny! Make more, seriously! |
It was the Tibet monicker! Your comment and the other 4 are funnier than the video! Wow, I'm really happy you liked it! I thought it looked like it was put together by a 12-year-old but now I feel better about it. Okay, I'll make more! |
_________________
"The problem with price quotes on the internet is you cannot confirm their validity."--Abraham Lincoln
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 16, 2008 - 03:04 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 07, 2002
Posts: 8631
|
|
| Johnny_Turbo wrote: |
It was the Tibet monicker! Your comment and the other 4 are funnier than the video! Wow, I'm really happy you liked it! I thought it looked like it was put together by a 12-year-old but now I feel better about it. Okay, I'll make more! |
Actually, I just watched it again. You are a surreal fellow, and I love it! Keep up the good work, Charlie Brown! |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
CaptLogan |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 16, 2008 - 04:59 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 17, 2002
Posts: 7697
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Status: Offline
|
|
| I got the chills! GOOD chills that is! |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
morgram |
|
|
Post subject: Re: FIRST PICTURES FROM STAR TREK!!! IT LOOKS GREAT!
Posted: Oct 16, 2008 - 05:43 PM
|
|
This account has been Permanently Banned
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 6049
Status: Offline
|
|
| Sylar`s nose is too big and THAT IS NOT THE ORIGINAL BRIDGE! Where`s the continuity to TOS??? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny_Turbo |
|
|
Post subject: Re: FIRST PICTURES FROM STAR TREK!!! IT LOOKS GREAT!
Posted: Oct 16, 2008 - 07:21 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 8366
Location: Chillville, PA
Status: Offline
|
|
Sylar`s nose is too big and THAT IS NOT THE ORIGINAL BRIDGE! Where`s the continuity to TOS???[/quote]
The big nose is a result of TV Land not listening to our requests for Michael Palin in The Life of Brian. You know the scene where Palin is called, "Big Nose" and he gets really angry after hearing it several times?
"You call me 'Big Nose' one more time and..."
Not the original bridge? TV Land's fault again. Their tentacles are starting to attach to everything non-TV land. TV Land is like The Blob, oozing it's way into our lives. It's time for us to team up and get 'em again! Now is no time to give up on sticking it to TV Land. |
_________________
"The problem with price quotes on the internet is you cannot confirm their validity."--Abraham Lincoln
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 16, 2008 - 09:29 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 1675
|
|
I see also the official site is under constuction
http://www.startrekmovie.com/
I wish someone would say where Star Trek is planning to go, I'm not really thrilled with the idea of a total remake of TOS or making Star Trek like Batman with every movie having a different Captain Kirk. I think Star Trek is different. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 16, 2008 - 10:36 PM
|
|
Member
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
Posts: 357
|
|
Nope sorry Harry. I've seen all the pics they released recently and I have to say it leaves me cold. Star Trek TOS was and still is among my most favorite shows and when I look at these new actors; well they have made these well known and beloved characters unrecognizable to me. I mean, I know who is playing what role but they are strangers and I feel no real need to get to know them. IMO no one can replace Bill, Leonard or DeForest in those roles.
I am afraid if this "new" version of trek catches on there is no place for it to go except to roll right over TOS almost erasing what has come before and that will not sit well with me or interest me in the least...But then again JJ doesn't care about alienating old fans, since he has said over and over he is making this movie for "fans who love movies not necessarily for the old fans of star trek" Well good luck with that JJ.
deb |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 17, 2008 - 12:36 AM
|
|
Member
Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 8074
Location: New Jersey USA
|
|
I'm reserving judgement on the movie until it comes out, however, I have to admit that the pics were cool!
Thanks Harry. |
_________________
Not an eye for an eye is the golden rule
Just leaves a room full of blind men...DMB
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 17, 2008 - 04:00 AM
|
|
Member
Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 15102
Location: CA
|
|
| HMmmmmm...Nice Pics for sure...I think I like the casting for Spock, Uhura and McCoy...Nice red uniform...COLORFUL...the rest IDK |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 17, 2008 - 08:06 AM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Posts: 14477
|
|
| littlestar wrote: | | HMmmmmm...Nice Pics for sure...I think I like the casting for Spock, Uhura and McCoy...Nice red uniform...COLORFUL...the rest IDK |
The character of Nero looks interesting. Let's hope Eric Bana pulls off the portrayal of a Romulan nasty as a memorable character. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Graham2271 |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 18, 2008 - 12:28 AM
|
|
Member
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Posts: 206
Status: Offline
|
|
| DebE wrote: | Nope sorry Harry. I've seen all the pics they released recently and I have to say it leaves me cold. Star Trek TOS was and still is among my most favorite shows and when I look at these new actors; well they have made these well known and beloved characters unrecognizable to me. I mean, I know who is playing what role but they are strangers and I feel no real need to get to know them. IMO no one can replace Bill, Leonard or DeForest in those roles.
I am afraid if this "new" version of trek catches on there is no place for it to go except to roll right over TOS almost erasing what has come before and that will not sit well with me or interest me in the least...But then again JJ doesn't care about alienating old fans, since he has said over and over he is making this movie for "fans who love movies not necessarily for the old fans of star trek" Well good luck with that JJ.
deb |
If it leaves you cold DebE, it leaves me frozen in shock-horror, you have made excellent points and I believe that it is appropriate for me to start a new thread on this topic. Your comments will be welcome. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 18, 2008 - 01:44 AM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 07, 2002
Posts: 8631
|
|
| Graham2271 wrote: | | I believe that it is appropriate for me to start a new thread on this topic. Your comments will be welcome. |
WHY?  |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
morgram |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 18, 2008 - 05:06 AM
|
|
This account has been Permanently Banned
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 6049
Status: Offline
|
|
| Harry_Mudd wrote: | | Graham2271 wrote: | | I believe that it is appropriate for me to start a new thread on this topic. Your comments will be welcome. |
WHY? |
Because Kirk, Spock, McCoy and Scotty deserve better than to be turned into effeminate politically correct eunuchs by J.J. Abrams. That`s why, Mudd. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 18, 2008 - 05:15 AM
|
|
Member
Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 8074
Location: New Jersey USA
|
|
| morgram wrote: | | Harry_Mudd wrote: | | Graham2271 wrote: | | I believe that it is appropriate for me to start a new thread on this topic. Your comments will be welcome. |
WHY? |
Because Kirk, Spock, McCoy and Scotty deserve better than to be turned into effeminate politically correct eunuchs by J.J. Abrams. That`s why, Mudd. |
You've already seen the movie???? |
_________________
Not an eye for an eye is the golden rule
Just leaves a room full of blind men...DMB
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 18, 2008 - 05:17 AM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Posts: 14477
|
|
It's only a frickin' movie for crying out loud folks. Methinks some obsess too much.
And I think folks mistake the actors for the characters.
The movies are about characters, the actors portraying these characters are not the characters themselves even though they may bring part of their personality to these roles. The problem I see is that we make gods out of them. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
morgram |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 18, 2008 - 05:19 AM
|
|
This account has been Permanently Banned
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 6049
Status: Offline
|
|
| CaptJTK wrote: | | morgram wrote: | | Harry_Mudd wrote: | | Graham2271 wrote: | | I believe that it is appropriate for me to start a new thread on this topic. Your comments will be welcome. |
WHY? |
Because Kirk, Spock, McCoy and Scotty deserve better than to be turned into effeminate politically correct eunuchs by J.J. Abrams. That`s why, Mudd. |
You've already seen the movie???? |
I really don`t think I have to. The pics speak volumes. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 18, 2008 - 05:20 AM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Posts: 14477
|
|
| morgram wrote: | | CaptJTK wrote: | | morgram wrote: | | Harry_Mudd wrote: | | Graham2271 wrote: | | I believe that it is appropriate for me to start a new thread on this topic. Your comments will be welcome. |
WHY? |
Because Kirk, Spock, McCoy and Scotty deserve better than to be turned into effeminate politically correct eunuchs by J.J. Abrams. That`s why, Mudd. |
You've already seen the movie???? |
I really don`t think I have to. The pics speak volumes. |
I would have to see the film to make an unbiased judgment Morgram. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
morgram |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 18, 2008 - 05:25 AM
|
|
This account has been Permanently Banned
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 6049
Status: Offline
|
|
| Mirizor wrote: | | morgram wrote: | | CaptJTK wrote: | | morgram wrote: | | Harry_Mudd wrote: | | Graham2271 wrote: | | I believe that it is appropriate for me to start a new thread on this topic. Your comments will be welcome. |
WHY? |
Because Kirk, Spock, McCoy and Scotty deserve better than to be turned into effeminate politically correct eunuchs by J.J. Abrams. That`s why, Mudd. |
You've already seen the movie???? |
I really don`t think I have to. The pics speak volumes. |
I would have to see the film to make an unbiased judgment Morgram. |
Yeah right. TOS fandom has been so unduly biased against Paramount, Berman and company ever since their perfectly understandable removal of Shatner from Star Trek back in 1994. Right? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Oct 18, 2008 - 05:28 AM
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Posts: 14477
|
|
| morgram wrote: | | Mirizor wrote: | | morgram wrote: | | CaptJTK wrote: | | morgram wrote: | | Harry_Mudd wrote: | | Graham2271 wrote: | | I believe that it is appropriate for me to start a new thread on this topic. Your comments will be welcome. |
WHY? |
Because Kirk, Spock, McCoy and Scotty deserve better than to be turned into effeminate politically correct eunuchs by J.J. Abrams. That`s why, Mudd. |
You've already seen the movie???? |
I really don`t think I have to. The pics speak volumes. |
I would have to see the film to make an unbiased judgment Morgram. |
Yeah right. TOS fandom has been so unduly biased against Paramount, Berman and company ever since their perfectly understandable removal of Shatner from Star Trek back in 1994. |
Bill went along with it at the time Morgram....why? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
