The Official Website - Nov 18, 2008 - 08:18 PM


 

 


 




 


 Log in Problems?
 New User? Sign Up!
 


Nerine Shatner Friendly House

This non profit organization is one of the nation's first residential homes for women recovering from alcohol and substance abuse.

Donate Here>>>

 
Hollywood
Charity
Horse Show


For the past eleven years, William Shatner has spearheaded the HCHS which features some of the best western reining riders in the country while simultaneously raising money for charity.

Donate Here>>>

 
  William
Shatner also
Supports:


March of
Dimes Canada

The Jewish
National Fund



 
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Gornman
20 Post subject: The Curmudgeons Have Won  PostPosted: Oct 05, 2008 - 07:00 PM
Member


Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Posts: 9980

Image

University of Idaho cheerleaders will unveil their new, more demure, uniforms at the home football game Saturday against Nevada.

Complaints that the previous uniforms were too short and revealing prompted the change.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/30268584.html

removed terrorists insert curmudgeon

/hey, now I can spell it Idea

_________________
Image


Last edited by Gornman on Oct 05, 2008 - 11:44 PM; edited 1 time in total
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
rdbOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 05, 2008 - 08:09 PM
Member


Joined: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 735
Location: Lakeland Florida
Status: Offline
I would agree- but there is a lot of "Bible-based" groups committing terrorism in this country (along with "animal rights" and "ecological" groups), and they're far more likely to be behind this than any foreign group (assuming that people think Terrorism is always a foreign thing). There are a lot of terrorist attacks that occur in the US that don't make the news- or maybe I should say they're not mentioned because admitting that the US has a terrorism problem itself would be politically harmful to certain interests.

I know of several places where "Bible-based" groups have been able to exert enough pressure to cause companies and others to censure things, especially those that expose those same groups. This is just another example.

As I keep trying to get people to understand- Taliban II is coming, and this time it's wearing a cross!!!
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
morgramOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 05, 2008 - 08:15 PM
Member


Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 3323

Status: Offline
rdb wrote:
I would agree- but there is a lot of "Bible-based" groups committing terrorism in this country (along with "animal rights" and "ecological" groups), and they're far more likely to be behind this than any foreign group (assuming that people think Terrorism is always a foreign thing). There are a lot of terrorist attacks that occur in the US that don't make the news- or maybe I should say they're not mentioned because admitting that the US has a terrorism problem itself would be politically harmful to certain interests.

I know of several places where "Bible-based" groups have been able to exert enough pressure to cause companies and others to censure things, especially those that expose those same groups. This is just another example.

As I keep trying to get people to understand- Taliban II is coming, and this time it's wearing a cross!!!
High time for a restoration of order.....IMPERIOUS REX!

_________________
"Leave the starship commanding to Bill because he already knows how to do it better than anybody else!" -morgram
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
rdbOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 05, 2008 - 08:53 PM
Member


Joined: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 735
Location: Lakeland Florida
Status: Offline
??? Confused Confused Confused

More like support the constitution and the principle of the separation of church and state.
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
DianaG
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 05, 2008 - 09:55 PM
Member


Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 5681
Location: Corn country in Illinois
rdb I hope you know there is nothing in the Constitution that says there is a separation of Church and State. That was written in a separate letter by Thomas Jefferson to the congress men and was never said in the constitution itself.. The things mentioned in the Constitution was to keep the State OUT of the Church and not the other way around.

And I'm sorry the Church and the cross is not the Taliban II. If there are problems in the church right now it's only a few congregations that are causing problems but most people in the Churches do have a right to practice thier rights and beliefs just like every one else in this country whether we like it or not.

As a Bible base believer I don't watch half the things on the TV any more just because of the immorallty, lying and sexual content (BL included) in them. People use God's name in vain and as a profanity every time I go down the street and go into a store...But i have to bite my lip and not say anything for fear of getting my head ripped off. We need more decency and morality in the way we live and not just wink at sin and t urn our heads and just move along...If we don't say anything or do anything I don't want to hear about people killing other people and people complaining about the violence. If all our society is filled with is violence then it will be violent...Garbage in...garbage comes out!!

DianaG

_________________
LT. Star Fleet Ship's Chaplain/Councelor, USSBlackhawk

"Jesus said to her I am the Resurrection and the Life ..." John 11:25

"O Death where is thy sting?.... the Victory is thru Jesus Christ." I Cor. 15:54-56
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
greenchick
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 05, 2008 - 11:21 PM
Member


Joined: Apr 14, 2004
Posts: 8402

Not too sure I understand this thread! I never thought I'd see the day where Gornie called Christian fundamentalists terrorists....

_________________
Image

Yes we can!
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
SMB
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 05, 2008 - 11:25 PM
Member


Joined: Feb 12, 2005
Posts: 9896
Location: I destroy my enemy when I make him my friend.--Abraham Lincoln
Why cant they have Cheerlizards? Laughing

ImageImageImage


ImageImageImage


ImageImageImage


And Bob, darling. I too, am a Bible believing person and think that sometimes young ladies need to take a bit more pride in their appearance and in their virtue (if any exists at all now-a-days).

It is not so much the outfits, it is the attitudes that they sometimes invoke, both in the wearer and in the viewer. Wink

Image

_________________
Image

Image
Let's do it as a memorial to Joyce Mason
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Gornman
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 05, 2008 - 11:33 PM
Member


Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Posts: 9980

I was making, (trying to) make a pun where they are
making the cheerleaders wear more dress Idea

You can insert (communists, asshats, etc....)

I enjoy my Saturday afternoon cheerleaders Arrow

I hear there is also some sort of sporting event Wink

Lighten up Idea

_________________
Image
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Reply with quote Back to top
DianaG
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 05, 2008 - 11:33 PM
Member


Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 5681
Location: Corn country in Illinois
Shocked

From what i can see on those young ladies in that picture up there I can see why people are complaining...the roll of the cheer leaders is to cheer the teams on to win...not have a semi porn show in short short short uniforms. Embarassed Embarassed

DianaG

_________________
LT. Star Fleet Ship's Chaplain/Councelor, USSBlackhawk

"Jesus said to her I am the Resurrection and the Life ..." John 11:25

"O Death where is thy sting?.... the Victory is thru Jesus Christ." I Cor. 15:54-56
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
JamiOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 06, 2008 - 12:23 AM
Member


Joined: Feb 27, 2005
Posts: 1603
Location: California
Status: Offline
Personally, I'm for outlawing cheerleaders all together. Not just their hooker-outfits.

_________________
~Jami JoAnne Russell~
www.jamisings.com
Image
Image
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
rdbOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 06, 2008 - 12:32 AM
Member


Joined: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 735
Location: Lakeland Florida
Status: Offline
Well, who sets societal standards?

I know that there are a lot of decent Christians who usually don't believe in forcing their views on others (I'm married to one). I am a Christian as well (and consider forcing one's views on others to be evil).

The problem is, there are decent Christians, and there are a LOT of people who claim Christ, but who want to force their standards on others. Years ago I attended a church (belonging to a big-name denomination) where one big argument was if it was "decent" for a girl to even GO SWIMMING. Not what she was wearing, but just SWIMMING (in mixed company, mind- if it was girls only, they thought it to be different). Other arguments- if any dancing was ok, or if it all is SIN. Drinking? SIN. Watching movies or TV? SIN. Reading anything that wasn't related to the Bible? (Some argument there, but the general idea was SIN!)

In other words, just about anything that wasn't work-related or church-related was sin. Even some work-related things were considered unacceptable.

There is a significant portion of American "Christianity" who follow either the New Apostolic Reformation or Christian Reconstructionism (or one of a few other variations of what is known as Christian Dominionism)- which call for the overthrow of the US government and the establishment of a theocracy (with their preachers at the top). They follow this sort of ideology- anything not specifically approved by the church leadership was forbidden (SIN) and should be banned. THEY chose what is sin and what isn't (and claim that it comes from the Bible). I won't get into what they advocate for people who don't agree with them- except to say it isn't pretty. I might also add that Theologians and experts on Biblical language and the Bible all disagree with many of their ideas about what sin is and isn't.

These dominionists are the "Taliban II"- and their beliefs and goals DO match the Taliban, except that the religion is different.

Here's an interesting tidbit- during the Martin Luther era, there was a meeting of the Protestant leaders. Attending this conference was a group of what are called today "Anabaptists". In almost all ways Martin Luthor and the other reformers agreed with the Anabaptists. The only difference was that they said that to force another to convert was a sin.

Martin Luthor and the others started a pogrom against them for that one difference.

I'm not Anabaptist, but I agree- forcing one's views on another is sin.

One other interesting point- although the ACLU has been derided in many churches as the "Anti-Christian Liberals Union"- approximately 1/3 of the cases they take involve DEFENDING CHRISTIANS against abuse. Many of the rest are when putative Christians are trying to force their religion on others. Jews, Muslims, Wiccans, even devil worshippers have freedom of religion in this country. It's not up to others to say to a group "we don't agree with you so you have no right to exist!"

There are a lot of tall tales about Christians being abused- but most of them are pure BS *sometimes with a grain of truth, but distorted to make the "Christians" look like the victim when they were the perpetrator!* If you want the real cases- go to the ACLU. Like I said, they step in to defend Christians as quickly as they defend anyone else.

That is why the separation of church and state is so important (and that is a principle that the ACLU strongly defends, along with the other guaranteed freedoms). I don't think people here would want a specific denominational viewpoint forced on them by the government (think of a denomination that you disagree with and put it in place of "denominational")- so it is with others about your denomination (and my beliefs as well).

As far as the cheerleaders- whatever floats their boat. If they choose to wear a really skimpy outfit, their choice. If they want to cover up, again their choice. They would be foolish to choose to violate the standards of society- and at the same time, how far do those standards go? Where every inch of skin (including face) is covered? Total nudity? Where is balance??? What about common sense (comfort and safety) and appearance?

By the way- yes, I know the history of the Principle of separation of Church and State- very well. I also know the Bill of Rights states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". I think that sums it up pretty well.
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
ChuckDOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 11, 2008 - 03:52 PM
Member


Joined: Oct 24, 2002
Posts: 6435
Location: Southwestern Connecticut, U.S.A Heroes: Bjorn Of Borg, and Bill, of course.
Status: Offline
Demure Cheerleaders? That's positively un-American.

_________________
Image
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
JamiOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 11, 2008 - 04:39 PM
Member


Joined: Feb 27, 2005
Posts: 1603
Location: California
Status: Offline
ChuckD wrote:
Demure Cheerleaders? That's positively un-American.


I personally think that cheerleaders, like models, force an unhealthy body standard on young girls, leading to more cases of anorexia, bulimia, etc. That's why we should do away with them all together. Forget the moral issues of them looking like prositutes. How about the little girls who see their fathers and brothers drooling over these girls and then deciding that they're too fat and throwing up their dinner to lose weight?

_________________
~Jami JoAnne Russell~
www.jamisings.com
Image
Image
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address  
Reply with quote Back to top
rdbOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 11, 2008 - 05:54 PM
Member


Joined: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 735
Location: Lakeland Florida
Status: Offline
Jami, you've brought up a very valid point- and while it's a much bigger problem with models than cheerleaders (who need to be strong, tough, and HEALTHY- people don't realize how strenuous and demanding that is {never was involved, but have talked to people who were cheerleaders}), it still is a society-wide issue.
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Powered by PNphpBB2 © 2003-2006 The PNphpBB Group
Credits
Bill's Space Lisabeth's Space Fan Club Forum News and Events Store Links
©2006 Picture Partners & Melis Productions

Contact WilliamShatner.com | Privacy Policy