WilliamShatner.com

Archives - Since when did Barbie acquire permanent underwear?

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 01:11 AM
Post subject: Since when did Barbie acquire permanent underwear?

I bought a barbie today, as a treat for getting a new job, and when I changed her clothes I was shocked to see she has permanent panties! When did this happen? How unsanitary!

For any of you who haven't been barbie shopping lately, Kayla has really beautiful long orange hair. She unfortunately is a mermaid though, so her fashion options are limited. I popped her head off and attached it to a regular, bipedal Barbie: perfection.

I wish they'd bring back the grasping hands and the curlable metal hair....

Diane

kilgorn - Nov 09, 2002 - 01:41 AM
Post subject: Barbie

Since when did Barbie acquire permanent underwear?
------------------------------------------------
I don't know..............and wouldn't tell if I did. Twisted Evil

jrinck - Nov 09, 2002 - 01:42 AM
Post subject:

It's a chastity belt. She's been ruining Mattell's image with her late night frolicking and loose behavior, so they decided to take action!

Dave - Nov 09, 2002 - 02:13 AM
Post subject:

I wonder if she's more emotional than Ken.

~Dave Laughing

bongborg - Nov 09, 2002 - 02:13 AM
Post subject:

Just since John Ashcroft became AG... he sent a Justice intimidation team to Mattel, to make sure no prepubescents could look up Barbies skirt to satisfy their natural curiousity...

Dave - Nov 09, 2002 - 02:57 AM
Post subject:

Hey, Bong. What's the new avatar supposed to be?
Looks pretty cute.

~Dave

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 03:02 AM
Post subject:

Dave wrote:

Hey, Bong. What's the new avatar supposed to be?
Looks pretty cute.

~Dave

What, indeed.

I like the other better. It reminded me of those superhigh (no pun) bondage shoes.

Diane

bongborg - Nov 09, 2002 - 03:03 AM
Post subject:

Dave wrote:

Hey, Bong. What's the new avatar supposed to be?
Looks pretty cute.

~Dave

LOL --- look closely at the pic, Dave. Here's a hint: it's not just cute, its useful, if you have a lighter.

Dave - Nov 09, 2002 - 03:04 AM
Post subject:

bongborg wrote:

Dave wrote:

Hey, Bong. What's the new avatar supposed to be?
Looks pretty cute.

~Dave

LOL --- look closely at the pic, Dave. Here's a hint: it's not just cute, its useful, if you have a lighter.

Send me your address and I'll be right over! Laughing

~Dave

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 03:05 AM
Post subject:

bongborg wrote:

Dave wrote:

Hey, Bong. What's the new avatar supposed to be?
Looks pretty cute.

~Dave

LOL --- look closely at the pic, Dave. Here's a hint: it's not just cute, its useful, if you have a lighter.

Bongborg has 69 posts.

diane

WillyStoner - Nov 09, 2002 - 03:08 AM
Post subject:

where they thong panties? Wink

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 03:18 AM
Post subject:

WillyStoner wrote:

where they thong panties? Wink

Alas, no. They are quite modest. But she still wears no bra.

Diane

bongborg - Nov 09, 2002 - 03:34 AM
Post subject:

*diane* wrote:

WillyStoner wrote:

where they thong panties? Wink

Alas, no. They are quite modest. But she still wears no bra.

Diane

And has no nipples...

Dave - Nov 09, 2002 - 03:40 AM
Post subject:

I'm not doll doctor, but it would seem that a sits bath of paint remover might help get rid of those nasty panties. Just a suggestion.

~Dave

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 03:42 AM
Post subject:

bongborg wrote:

*diane* wrote:

WillyStoner wrote:

where they thong panties? Wink

Alas, no. They are quite modest. But she still wears no bra.

Diane

And has no nipples...

There is a great documentary from a few years back on the modifications people make to Barbie. Giving her nipples seems to be a common one. Perhaps I can fashion some for mine.

Diane

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 03:43 AM
Post subject:

Dave wrote:

I'm not doll doctor, but it would seem that a sits bath of paint remover might help get rid of those nasty panties. Just a suggestion.

~Dave

They aren't just painted on, they are molded into the plastic, and texturized!

Diane

Dave - Nov 09, 2002 - 03:50 AM
Post subject:

*diane* wrote:

Dave wrote:

I'm not doll doctor, but it would seem that a sits bath of paint remover might help get rid of those nasty panties. Just a suggestion.

~Dave

They aren't just painted on, they are molded into the plastic, and texturized!

Diane

Crap!! Guess you'll need some sandpaper too. Shocked

~Dave

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 03:53 AM
Post subject:

My wife can help. She and her sister both have created One of a Kind (OOAK) Barbies and sold them on Ebay. If done well they bring a fortune. Here is my sister in law's website:

Always Allie Creations

astrogirl - Nov 09, 2002 - 04:01 AM
Post subject:

I have this friend who brought Barbies to school and drew stuff in certain places on them. A teacher took them and started making jokes about them. She's lucky that teacher likes to make jokes that are just as perverted as her jokes.

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 04:01 AM
Post subject:

Nighthawk wrote:

Those are AMAZING! Your wife and your sister are both fantastic artists. Maybe it's time for me to get out the model paint!

Seriously, that looks like a lot of fun to do. My dad used to do train sets; he was very good at the painting, and I always thought it was so cool. Kicking around in the "projects for another day" room of my brain is making a dollhouse based on the house we used to live in when I was a kid. Scale modeling is so great.

Diane

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 04:20 AM
Post subject:

*diane* wrote:

Nighthawk wrote:

Yes it is; however I don't have the patience for it. Your idea sounds very cool. Personally I always wanted to build a scale model railroad of Lovecraft's Innsmouth with various nefarious things going on throughout.

I did not know my wife's dolls were on my sister-in-law's site. I will have to go back and look again. Please allow me to clarify that this is my sister-in-law NOT my sister. Thanks! Love, Nh

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 04:33 AM
Post subject:

Nighthawk wrote:

[
Yes it is; however I don't have the patience for it. Your idea sounds very cool. Personally I always wanted to build a scale model railroad of Lovecraft's Innsmouth with various nefarious things going on throughout.

I did not know my wife's dolls were on my sister-in-law's site. I will have to go back and look again. Please allow me to clarify that this is my sister-in-law NOT my sister. Thanks! Love, Nh

A Lovecraftian railroad...heh heh heh...it is almost too terrible to contemplate! Each time I think upon it, I feel the fevers begin to rise in my feeble brain. Curse that Mad Arab who first laid to paper the horrid tales of things we should not speak!

Good ole HP...sometimes it's pretty obvious he was getting paid by the word. He could make quite a living today writing lines for Mojo Jojo.

Diane

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 04:44 AM
Post subject:

I will resist the urge to do a Mojo Jojo riff. But it ain't easy.

If Lovecraft were alive today I don't think he would be writing for TPPG. I think he would be saying "Help! Let me out of this box!"

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 04:51 AM
Post subject:

Nighthawk wrote:

I will resist the urge to do a Mojo Jojo riff. But it ain't easy.

If Lovecraft were alive today I don't think he would be writing for TPPG. I think he would be saying "Help! Let me out of this box!"

Ba-da-bing!

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 05:27 AM
Post subject:

NH--

You have, I am sure, seen the recent story on Bondage Barbie.

I've seen pics of these things before--some are a scream.

Diane

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 05:43 AM
Post subject:

You would have loved the Vampire Barbie my wife made. I have no idea if she still has a picture but I'll look.

littlestar - Nov 09, 2002 - 06:48 PM
Post subject:

Vampire Barbie?...VAMPIRE BARBIE!!!...Santa? ....Hello?...Santa?....I've been very, very ,..VERY good this year... Exclamation

June - Nov 09, 2002 - 08:31 PM
Post subject: Re: Since when did Barbie acquire permanent underwear?

*diane* wrote:

I bought a barbie today... I popped her head off and attached it to a regular, bipedal Barbie: perfection.

Diane

I used to pop all my Barbie's heads off too!!!

What does that mean, I wonder;-)

June

Anonymous - Nov 09, 2002 - 09:03 PM
Post subject: Re: Since when did Barbie acquire permanent underwear?

June wrote:

*diane* wrote:

I bought a barbie today... I popped her head off and attached it to a regular, bipedal Barbie: perfection.

Diane

I used to pop all my Barbie's heads off too!!!

What does that mean, I wonder;-)

June

Apparently we aren't the only ones. Today's barbie heads are much more firmly attached, using a backward facing double pronged almost harpoon like device. No easy task beheading one!

Diane

Anonymous - Nov 10, 2002 - 04:50 AM
Post subject: Re: Since when did Barbie acquire permanent underwear?

June wrote:

*diane* wrote:

I bought a barbie today... I popped her head off and attached it to a regular, bipedal Barbie: perfection.

Diane

I used to pop all my Barbie's heads off too!!!

What does that mean, I wonder;-)

June

Something nefarious I'm sure. Dave Erifah and Rag451 can blame it on the Clinton administration. Just ask them!

Anonymous - Nov 10, 2002 - 04:51 AM
Post subject:

littlestar wrote:

Vampire Barbie?...VAMPIRE BARBIE!!!...Santa? ....Hello?...Santa?....I've been very, very ,..VERY good this year... Exclamation

But I bet when you're bad you're better....

Paul - Nov 10, 2002 - 05:28 AM
Post subject:

I have it on good authority that Star Trek Barbie does not have permanent underwear but the 1974 Mego Kirk figure does...modesty in the 70's who would have thought????

Anonymous - Nov 10, 2002 - 05:30 AM
Post subject:

Paul wrote:

I have it on good authority that Star Trek Barbie does not have permanent underwear but the 1974 Mego Kirk figure does...modesty in the 70's who would have thought????

Think of the legions of pre-pubescent RSF'ers who were so sorely disappointed....

joains - Nov 11, 2002 - 02:46 PM
Post subject:

There is a song I have sung before that fits this disscussion, sort of, it is called...'Never wear panties to a party"......the lyrics shall not be posted here Very Happy

Anonymous - Nov 11, 2002 - 02:59 PM
Post subject:

joains wrote:

There is a song I have sung before that fits this disscussion, sort of, it is called...'Never wear panties to a party"......the lyrics shall not be posted here Very Happy

I learned, the hard way, that one SHOULD always wear panties to a party, especially if one is also wearing an extremely short dress. Shocked

Diane

joains - Nov 11, 2002 - 03:01 PM
Post subject:

*diane* wrote:

joains wrote:

There is a song I have sung before that fits this disscussion, sort of, it is called...'Never wear panties to a party"......the lyrics shall not be posted here Very Happy

I learned, the hard way, that one SHOULD always wear panties to a party, especially if one is also wearing an extremely short dress. Shocked

Diane

We don't go to the same parties.

Anonymous - Nov 12, 2002 - 07:20 AM
Post subject:

The next time either of you has a party I expect an invitation.

LividEmerald - Nov 12, 2002 - 08:10 AM
Post subject: object

Do they make a "Monica Lewinsky" Barbie?

CaptJTK - Nov 12, 2002 - 03:18 PM
Post subject:

Don't forget the ever popular Trailer Trash Barbie.

Betcha this one doesn't have panties.

CaptJTK Laughing

DOC - Nov 12, 2002 - 03:59 PM
Post subject:

BARBIE VAMPIRE...wow!!!

Dave - Nov 12, 2002 - 04:29 PM
Post subject:

Permanent underwear is irrelevant.
Resistance is futile.
She will be assimilated.

~Dave

joains - Nov 12, 2002 - 04:31 PM
Post subject:

CaptJTK wrote:

Don't forget the ever popular Trailer Trash Barbie.

Betcha this one doesn't have panties.

CaptJTK Laughing

Cap---The whole idea of not wearing panties to a party is to make sure the right people know that you did not wear them. Otherwise, what is the point? Very Happy

Dave - Nov 12, 2002 - 04:33 PM
Post subject:

DOC wrote:

BARBIE VAMPIRE...wow!!!

It seemed strange to see a vampire
with a large cross hanging around her neck.

~Dave

joains - Nov 12, 2002 - 04:34 PM
Post subject:

Nighthawk wrote:

The next time either of you has a party I expect an invitation.

I was in Plano Texas last week end and I did tell everyone. Even posted a picture proving both points to the pictures thread.... Very Happy

joains - Nov 12, 2002 - 04:50 PM
Post subject:

Paul wrote:

I have it on good authority that Star Trek Barbie does not have permanent underwear but the 1974 Mego Kirk figure does...modesty in the 70's who would have thought????

mmmmm...Paul...one question? ...is the underwear signed? Very Happy

(I have started a collection of signed underwear, if you must know. ) Razz

not really..... Very Happy

Cuzsis - Nov 12, 2002 - 06:16 PM
Post subject:

This thread is distrubing. LOL!

Dave - Nov 12, 2002 - 06:56 PM
Post subject:

joains wrote:

Paul wrote:

I have it on good authority that Star Trek Barbie does not have permanent underwear but the 1974 Mego Kirk figure does...modesty in the 70's who would have thought????

mmmmm...Paul...one question? ...is the underwear signed? Very Happy

(I have started a collection of signed underwear, if you must know. ) Razz

not really..... Very Happy

And who does he know, who goes around checking Barbie for panties?

~Dave Laughing

joains - Nov 12, 2002 - 11:41 PM
Post subject:

Dave wrote:

joains wrote:

Paul wrote:

I have it on good authority that Star Trek Barbie does not have permanent underwear but the 1974 Mego Kirk figure does...modesty in the 70's who would have thought????

mmmmm...Paul...one question? ...is the underwear signed? Very Happy

(I have started a collection of signed underwear, if you must know. ) Razz

not really..... Very Happy

And who does he know, who goes around checking Barbie for panties?

looking for a part time job Dave? I thought you were retired... Very Happy

~Dave

bongborg - Nov 12, 2002 - 11:59 PM
Post subject:

[quote="joains"]

Dave wrote:

joains wrote:

Paul wrote:

I have it on good authority that Star Trek Barbie does not have permanent underwear but the 1974 Mego Kirk figure does...modesty in the 70's who would have thought????

mmmmm...Paul...one question? ...is the underwear signed? Very Happy

(I have started a collection of signed underwear, if you must know. ) Razz

not really..... Very Happy

And who does he know, who goes around checking Barbie for panties?

looking for a part time job Dave? I thought you were retired... Very Happy

I believe Dave is a postal employee, one of those soon to be coopted as informers for the Homeland Security Department... maybe he will be the official doll panties inspector, making sure all the dolls are exhibiting proper American morals and not exhibiting their fundamental...differences...

Anonymous - Nov 13, 2002 - 12:17 AM
Post subject:

bongborg wrote:

Unless they were Jeri Ryan dolls, that is. Wink

Diane

bongborg - Nov 13, 2002 - 12:21 AM
Post subject:

*diane* wrote:

bongborg wrote:

Unless they were Jeri Ryan dolls, that is. Wink

Diane

THEY MAKE JERI RYAN DOLLS? HOW BIG?

Anonymous - Nov 13, 2002 - 12:30 AM
Post subject:

bongborg wrote:

*diane* wrote:

bongborg wrote:

Unless they were Jeri Ryan dolls, that is. Wink

Diane

THEY MAKE JERI RYAN DOLLS? HOW BIG?

Unfortunately, her pants are painted on--literally.

Diane

NickSci1 - Nov 13, 2002 - 01:10 AM
Post subject:

That reminds me of a women action figure I have and it was very detail. I did buy a women action figure about three years ago and yes she did have underwear on and yes she did have nipples. It was very detailed action figure and she did come with an outfit.

bongborg - Nov 13, 2002 - 01:43 AM
Post subject:

NickSci1 wrote:

It wasn't an inflatable action figure, was it?

NickSci1 - Nov 13, 2002 - 02:07 AM
Post subject:

No Bongborg it's a figure. A plastic figure.

Anonymous - Nov 13, 2002 - 03:22 AM
Post subject:

Dave wrote:

joains wrote:

Paul wrote:

I have it on good authority that Star Trek Barbie does not have permanent underwear but the 1974 Mego Kirk figure does...modesty in the 70's who would have thought????

mmmmm...Paul...one question? ...is the underwear signed? Very Happy

(I have started a collection of signed underwear, if you must know. ) Razz

not really..... Very Happy

And who does he know, who goes around checking Barbie for panties?

~Dave Laughing

John Ashcroft.

bongborg - Nov 13, 2002 - 03:51 AM
Post subject:

Nighthawk wrote:

Dave wrote:

joains wrote:

Paul wrote:

I have it on good authority that Star Trek Barbie does not have permanent underwear but the 1974 Mego Kirk figure does...modesty in the 70's who would have thought????

mmmmm...Paul...one question? ...is the underwear signed? Very Happy

(I have started a collection of signed underwear, if you must know. ) Razz

not really..... Very Happy

And who does he know, who goes around checking Barbie for panties?

~Dave Laughing

John Ashcroft.

LOL. Ok, maybe John Ashcroft doesn't check Barbie for panties, but he did order the bare breasts of the statues of Justice at the DOJ offices to be covered up. Who does he think will be corrupted by those bare marble teats? It just escapes me. Does he think if his goons see stone breasts it will inflame them with lust and they will then skip his daily prayer meetings to hit the strip clubs?

Anonymous - Nov 13, 2002 - 03:58 AM
Post subject: Re: Barbie

Since when did Barbie acquire permanent underwear?

Since she has been hanging out a lot with Ken. It's the underpantie condom.

SuzeQ

Paul - Nov 13, 2002 - 04:14 AM
Post subject:

Dave wrote:

joains wrote:

Paul wrote:

I have it on good authority that Star Trek Barbie does not have permanent underwear but the 1974 Mego Kirk figure does...modesty in the 70's who would have thought????

mmmmm...Paul...one question? ...is the underwear signed? Very Happy

(I have started a collection of signed underwear, if you must know. ) Razz

not really..... Very Happy

And who does he know, who goes around checking Barbie for panties?

~Dave Laughing

WHEW! At least Dave didn't ask how I knew about the Kirk underwear.... Wink

Anonymous - Nov 13, 2002 - 04:19 AM
Post subject:

It's Paul's job to inspect all that stuff. (Pay me the 20 later Paul.) Wink