| Claudia wrote: | | angel wrote: | Didn't know that the "gentleman" had been a woman at one time. I was thinking this was something of that movie Junior. If this had been an actual male giving birth, then this would have been something to crow about. Especially if the "man" didn't have an uterus. I was thinking that it wasn't fair that the guy wouldn't have had to experience birthing pains and to my way of thinking that would be cheating. Everyone who gives birth experiences those and a man should be no different. But seeing how this "gentleman" still had some female in him left to birth a baby, he experienced the pain. All I can say is "congrats lad".  |
Having had both a ceasarian section birth and two normal deliveries, I still think that birth without a ceasar is preferable There is a lot to say for a pain free delivery ( ceasar), but the recovery period is so much quicker with a normal delivery. And the pain of a normal delivery is soon forgotten, especially if the birth is trouble free. With a ceasarian section the pain is after the birth in your tummy across the scar, with all the complications following major surgery like inflammation of the wound etc....just when you need all your strength and stamina to look after a new born baby.
I am glad for his sake the man could give birth through the uterus.
 |
I was never able to have a child due to uterine cancer, but I do have a large scar from where the "farm" was removed. The recovery time was not fun either. But at least I am cancer free now and have a battle scar to wear proudly.  |